How do I measure whether interactive video is actually working?

What does “working” actually mean for interactive video?

Before you can measure success, you need to define what success looks like. For interactive video on a B2B website, “working” rarely means just getting more views. Instead, it means your video is helping visitors understand you faster, move through your site with more confidence, and take meaningful next steps like starting a trial, booking a demo, or progressing in a sales cycle.

That’s why you should think about measurement in layers: first, are people engaging with the experience at all? Second, does that engagement lead to higher on-page conversions? And third, does it show up in pipeline and revenue? When you track each of these layers, you can quickly tell whether your interactive journeys are nice-to-have ornaments or genuine growth levers.

Which basic engagement metrics should we track first?

Engagement metrics tell you whether your interactive video is grabbing attention and keeping it long enough to be useful. They won’t prove business impact on their own, but they’re your early-warning system for creative, placement, or UX problems.

Start with:

• Play rate: The percentage of visitors who start the interactive video out of those who see it. Low play rates often indicate an unclear value proposition, poor thumbnail or headline, or awkward placement on the page.
• CTA clicks: Are viewers taking action after viewing your content?
• Bounce rate: When interactive video is placed well, it typically reduces bounce because visitors have something engaging, human, and immediately useful to interact with.
• Time on site: Time on site shows whether buyers are staying long enough to meaningfully explore. Interactive video tends to lift this metric because short segments and branching paths give visitors reasons to continue engaging. Customers using ReelFlow commonly report 2–3× increases in time on site.
• Events per session: This measures how many meaningful interactions a visitor takes during a single visit — clicks, path choices, CTA taps, video branch selections. Interactive video should increase this number because it gives visitors intuitive, low-effort actions that guide their research.

These numbers help answer questions like: “Is our hero flow compelling enough to start?” and “Do people use the video to navigate around my site?”

What interaction signals show whether visitors find value?

Interactive video is unique because it generates click-level behaviour inside the experience. That means you’re not just measuring passive watching—you’re seeing what visitors actually choose and where they hesitate. These interaction signals tell you if your content matches buyer questions and intent.

Useful interaction metrics include:

• Branch selection rates: Which options viewers click at decision points (e.g. “Show me pricing” vs “Show me how it works”). This reveals what they care about most.
• Path distribution: The percentage of visitors following each journey
• Drop-off by branch: Where people exit within each path. A high drop-off right after selecting “pricing” can signal confusion or anxiety in that story.
• Step-to-step conversion: How many viewers move from one segment to the next, especially around key explanations or objections.

These signals help you refine both your narrative and your UX. For example, if almost everyone chooses the “Help me pick a plan” branch but many abandon it halfway through, you’ve discovered a high-value area that needs a clearer, shorter explanation.

How can we see whether interactive video impacts pipeline and sales?

The final layer of measurement is pipeline and revenue. This is where you find out whether your interactive journeys are influencing real deals, not just generating nicer dashboards. To get here, you need to connect website and video events to your CRM.

Useful pipeline-level views include:

• Leads influenced by interactive video: Contacts who engaged with a specific journey before converting or being created as leads.
• Opportunity creation rate: How often video-engaged leads become opportunities versus non-engaged visitors.
• Win rate and deal size: Whether opportunities associated with interactive video exposure close more often or at higher values.
• Sales cycle speed: Whether deals progress through stages faster when key stakeholders have watched certain flows (e.g. pricing or implementation branches).

You don’t need a perfect multi-touch attribution system to start. Even basic comparisons—like “opportunities where the champion completed our homepage journey vs those that didn’t”—can surface meaningful patterns. When sales leaders can see that video-engaged accounts move faster or close more often, it becomes much easier to justify further investment.

‍

FAQ

What’s the fastest way to tell if interactive video is helping?

Compare engagement rates between before adding interactive video to your site, and after. Check play rates on your interactive video. Measure CTA clicks on the interactive elements to confirm that viewers take action after watching.

How long should we run an experiment before deciding if it works?

That depends on the size of your site and the number of visitors. Give each interactive experience enough traffic and time before drawing conclusions.

Do we need complex attribution models to measure impact?

No. Start with simple before/after and viewer/non-viewer comparisons, then evolve to more advanced attribution if needed.

What if engagement is high but conversions don’t move?

That’s a signal to adjust the story, CTAs, or placement—your video may be interesting but not aligned with the next step buyers need to take.